Back to Insights
Framework

The Signal/Noise Framework: How Steve Jobs Made Decisions

Steve Jobs was famous for saying no. Learn the mental model he used to separate what matters from what doesn't — and how to apply it to your own work.

NG

Nicola Gastaldello

Founder

January 5, 20257 min read
S/N

Introduction

In 1997, Steve Jobs returned to a nearly bankrupt Apple. The company had over 350 products. Within months, Jobs cut that number to just 10.

"People think focus means saying yes to the thing you've got to focus on," Jobs explained. "But that's not what it means at all. It means saying no to the hundred other good ideas."

This wasn't arbitrary ruthlessness. Jobs was applying a mental model that separated what truly mattered from everything else — what we call the Signal/Noise framework.

Understanding this framework won't just help you make better decisions. It will fundamentally change how you think about work, priorities, and what deserves your attention.

What Is Signal and What Is Noise?

In engineering, signal refers to the information you want. Noise is everything else — the interference, the static, the data that obscures what matters.

Applied to work and decision-making:

Signal is any task, project, or commitment that directly advances your most important goals. It's the work that creates disproportionate value. Signal tasks are aligned with your strategy, leverage your unique strengths, and move the needle on outcomes you actually care about.

Noise is everything else. And here's the uncomfortable truth: most of what fills our days is noise.

Noise isn't necessarily bad work. It's often necessary work — emails that need responses, meetings that need attendance, tasks that need completion. But noise doesn't create differentiated value. It maintains the status quo. It keeps things running without moving them forward.

The most successful people aren't those who work the hardest. They're those who have the highest signal-to-noise ratio in how they spend their time.

Why Most People Have It Backwards

Most productivity advice focuses on doing more. More tasks. More efficiently. More hours. Better systems for managing an ever-growing list of commitments.

This is exactly wrong.

The problem isn't that you're not productive enough. The problem is that you're productive at the wrong things. You're efficiently processing noise while signal gets buried.

Consider a typical executive's day:

  • 6 hours in meetings (mostly noise)
  • 2 hours on email (mostly noise)
  • 1 hour on administrative tasks (noise)
  • 45 minutes on actual strategic work (signal)

That's a signal ratio of less than 10%. And this executive probably feels busy, productive, and completely overwhelmed.

The goal isn't to do more. The goal is to ruthlessly protect time for signal while minimizing time spent on noise.

The 80/20 Rule, Applied Correctly

You've probably heard of the Pareto Principle: 80% of results come from 20% of efforts. Most people misunderstand what this means.

It doesn't mean you should work harder on everything. It means you should identify the 20% that actually matters and redirect your energy there.

At SayNo, we've found that top performers maintain a signal ratio of around 80% — they spend four out of every five hours on work that directly advances their goals. Average performers hover around 20%.

The difference isn't intelligence or work ethic. It's clarity about what constitutes signal and discipline in protecting time for it.

How to Identify Signal

Identifying signal requires honest answers to hard questions.

Question 1: What are my actual goals?

Not what sounds impressive. Not what you think you should want. What do you actually want to achieve in the next 90 days?

If you can't answer this clearly, everything feels like signal because nothing is. Define your goals first. Everything else becomes easier.

Question 2: Does this task directly advance those goals?

Not "could this help eventually" or "this might be useful." Directly. If the connection requires multiple logical leaps, it's probably noise.

Question 3: Am I the only person who can do this?

Many tasks feel important because they're in front of you. But if someone else could do this work — even if not quite as well — it's likely noise for you.

Question 4: What would happen if I didn't do this?

For most tasks that feel urgent, the honest answer is: not much. The world would continue. The project would adapt. Someone else would handle it.

Signal tasks fail this test. If you don't do them, something important doesn't happen.

Common Types of Noise

Once you start looking, you'll find noise everywhere. Here are the most common types:

Meeting Noise

Most meetings are noise. Status updates that could be async. Decisions that could be made by one person. "Brainstorms" that produce nothing actionable.

Ask yourself: Will this meeting change what I do tomorrow? If not, it's probably noise.

Email Noise

The average professional spends 28% of their workweek on email. Almost none of it is signal.

The emails that matter — the ones that actually require your input and advance your goals — are maybe 5% of what you receive. The rest is CC theater, FYI updates, and requests that should go elsewhere.

Task Noise

Your todo list is full of noise. Tasks that have been there for weeks. Things you "should" do but never will. Commitments made from guilt rather than alignment.

If a task doesn't connect to your goals and you've been avoiding it for weeks, it's noise. Delete it.

Urgency Noise

Urgency is a poor proxy for importance. Most urgent things aren't important. They just feel that way because someone else decided they needed immediate attention.

True signal rarely arrives as urgent. Strategic work, relationship building, skill development — these create massive value but never scream for immediate attention.

How to Protect Signal Time

Identifying signal is only half the battle. You also need to protect time for it.

Block Signal Time First

Don't schedule signal work into whatever time remains after meetings. Block signal time first — ideally in 2-4 hour chunks — and treat it as non-negotiable.

Jobs was famous for protecting his mornings for thinking. Warren Buffett keeps his calendar almost entirely empty. They understand that signal work requires sustained attention.

Make Noise Visible

Track how you actually spend your time for a week. Categorize everything as signal or noise. The results will probably horrify you.

This visibility alone changes behavior. When you see that you spent 40 hours last week on work that didn't advance your goals, you naturally start making different choices.

Create Noise Budgets

You can't eliminate noise entirely. Some meetings must happen. Some emails must be answered. Some administrative tasks must be done.

But you can budget for noise. Decide that you'll spend no more than 20% of your time on noise activities. When you hit that budget, start saying no.

Raise the Bar for New Commitments

Every new commitment is either signal or noise. Before saying yes, ask: Does this deserve to displace something currently in my signal time?

If yes, make the trade explicitly. If no, decline.

The Compound Effect

The Signal/Noise framework isn't just about daily productivity. It's about compound returns over time.

Consider two professionals with equal talent and work ethic. One maintains a 20% signal ratio. The other maintains an 80% signal ratio.

After one year, the second professional has invested four times more hours in work that matters. After five years, the gap becomes enormous. After a decade, they're not even in the same category.

Jobs understood this. His obsession with saying no wasn't about working less. It was about ensuring that every hour Apple's best people spent was high-signal work.

The iPhone didn't happen because Apple worked harder than competitors. It happened because Apple focused intensely on fewer things that mattered more.

Conclusion

The Signal/Noise framework is simple to understand and difficult to apply. It requires clarity about what you actually want, honesty about how you currently spend time, and discipline to protect signal work from the constant pull of noise.

But the payoff is enormous. Not just more productivity, but more meaningful productivity. Not just busy days, but days spent on work that actually matters.

Jobs had a question he asked about every product decision: "Is this insanely great?" If the answer was no, it was noise.

What's your version of that question? And how much of your current work would pass the test?


SayNo helps you separate signal from noise automatically. Connect your tasks, set your goals, and watch your signal ratio improve.

Written by

NG

Nicola Gastaldello

Founder

Helping founders and teams achieve sustainable growth through focus and strategic prioritization.

Ready to focus on what matters?

Join thousands of founders and leaders using SayNo to separate signal from noise.